Federal Judge Approves $1.8 Million Settlement in Uber Airport Rider Case

04.28.2016

Customers had paid $4 ‘airport fee toll’ on top of regular fare

On the same day Uber agreed to pay $100 million to drivers to settle a lawsuit over whether the drivers were properly treated as contract employees, Judge Maria-Elena James of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California approved another settlement of a class-action lawsuit alleging the ride-share giant had mischaracterized a fee charged some customers for trips to or from certain airports in California.

The $4 fee was listed as an “airport fee toll,” which implied a fee charged by the airports. In actuality, Uber pocketed the money.

Uber denied misrepresenting the nature of the fee, but agreed to return 100 percent of the fee to the 355,000 customers who had been charged.

Because of the technology used by Uber, the company will be able to distribute all of the refunds without having to find or notify members of the class. Uber did not object to the settlement. In addition, Uber agreed to pay all administrative costs and legal fees.

Uber has been enjoined from charging any further airport fees to riders in the future unless it pays them to the airport.

The lawsuit was filed by Vamsi Tadepalli, who was represented by John Roddy and Elizabeth Ryan of Bailey Glasser’s Boston office and Mike McKay of Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns.

Practice Areas

Jump to Page

Bailey Glasser Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek